Libya vs Norway: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4)
Libya
0 kt
in 2024
Norway
0 kt
in 2024
Libya rank
34th
Norway rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Libya
- Norway
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Norway, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 34th and Norway ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0014 kt | 0.0006 kt | 0.0007 kt | Libya |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | Norway |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Libya or Norway?
- Libya, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Norway as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Libya and Norway?
- 0 kt, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Norway?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Norway rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Libya ranks 34th and Norway ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.