Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Libya or Russian Federation?

Libya, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Russian Federation as of 2024.

How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Russian Federation?

33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Libya vs Russian Federation: Closed shrubland — Emissions

Libya

0 kt

in 2024

Russian Federation

0 kt

in 2024

Libya rank

34th

Russian Federation rank

34th

Closed shrubland — Emissions over time

Libya
Russian Federation

How they compare

Libya currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Russian Federation, a difference of 0 kt.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.

Libya ranks 34th and Russian Federation ranks 34th of 219 countries.

Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Libya	Russian Federation	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0016 kt	2.22 kt	2.22 kt	Russian Federation
2000s	0 kt	0.3384 kt	0.3384 kt	Russian Federation
2010s	0 kt	0.0172 kt	0.0172 kt	Russian Federation
2020s	0 kt	0.0016 kt	0.0016 kt	Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Libya or Russian Federation?: Libya, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Russian Federation as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Libya and Russian Federation?: 0 kt, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Russian Federation?: 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
How do Libya and Russian Federation rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?: Libya ranks 34th and Russian Federation ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Russian Federation: Closed shrubland — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/libya/russian-federation-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/libya/russian-federation-2/">Libya vs Russian Federation: Closed shrubland — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4)
Unit: kt
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 271 places, 9,259 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed: 12 August 2026

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.