Lithuania vs Philippines: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4)
Lithuania
0 kt
in 2024
Philippines
0 kt
in 2024
Lithuania rank
34th
Philippines rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Lithuania
- Philippines
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Philippines, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 34th and Philippines ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0119 kt | 0.0118 kt | Philippines |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0012 kt | 0.0012 kt | Philippines |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Lithuania or Philippines?
- Lithuania, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Philippines as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Lithuania and Philippines?
- 0 kt, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Philippines?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and Philippines rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Lithuania ranks 34th and Philippines ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.