Malta vs Polynesia: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1
Malta
0 kt
in 2024
Polynesia
0 kt
in 2024
Malta rank
36th
Polynesia rank
36th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Malta
- Polynesia
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Polynesia, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Polynesia has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 36th and Polynesia ranks 36th of 235 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1, Malta or Polynesia?
- Malta, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Polynesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1 between Malta and Polynesia?
- 0 kt, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Polynesia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Malta and Polynesia rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1?
- Malta ranks 36th and Polynesia ranks 36th of 235 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.