Mexico vs Zimbabwe: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4)
Mexico
0.2872 kt
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0.2287 kt
in 2024
Mexico rank
10th
Zimbabwe rank
12th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Mexico
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 0.2872 kt against 0.2287 kt in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0585 kt.
That makes Mexico's figure about 1.3 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Mexico ranks 10th and Zimbabwe ranks 12th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.2 kt | 3.17 kt | 0.9756 kt | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 1.23 kt | 9.56 kt | 8.33 kt | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 0.739 kt | 3.64 kt | 2.9 kt | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0.843 kt | 0.692 kt | 0.151 kt | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Mexico or Zimbabwe?
- Mexico, at 0.2872 kt against 0.2287 kt in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Mexico and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0585 kt, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Zimbabwe?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Mexico and Zimbabwe rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Mexico ranks 10th and Zimbabwe ranks 12th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.