New Zealand vs Rwanda: Closed shrubland — Emissions
New Zealand
0 kt
in 2024
Rwanda
0 kt
in 2024
New Zealand rank
34th
Rwanda rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions over time
- New Zealand
- Rwanda
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Rwanda, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Rwanda ahead.
New Zealand ranks 34th and Rwanda ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0011 kt | 0.0019 kt | 0.0008 kt | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 0.0006 kt | 0.0004 kt | 0.0001 kt | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, New Zealand or Rwanda?
- New Zealand, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between New Zealand and Rwanda?
- 0 kt, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Rwanda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do New Zealand and Rwanda rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- New Zealand ranks 34th and Rwanda ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.