New Zealand vs Saudi Arabia: Closed shrubland — Emissions
New Zealand
0 kt
in 2024
Saudi Arabia
0 kt
in 2024
New Zealand rank
34th
Saudi Arabia rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions over time
- New Zealand
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 34th and Saudi Arabia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0011 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.001 kt | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 0.0006 kt | 0 kt | 0.0006 kt | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, New Zealand or Saudi Arabia?
- New Zealand, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Saudi Arabia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between New Zealand and Saudi Arabia?
- 0 kt, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Saudi Arabia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do New Zealand and Saudi Arabia rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- New Zealand ranks 34th and Saudi Arabia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.