New Zealand vs Uruguay: Closed shrubland — Emissions
New Zealand
0 kt
in 2024
Uruguay
0 kt
in 2024
New Zealand rank
34th
Uruguay rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions over time
- New Zealand
- Uruguay
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Uruguay, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 34th and Uruguay ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0011 kt | 0.0103 kt | 0.0092 kt | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 0.0006 kt | 0.0052 kt | 0.0046 kt | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0003 kt | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, New Zealand or Uruguay?
- New Zealand, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Uruguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between New Zealand and Uruguay?
- 0 kt, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Uruguay?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do New Zealand and Uruguay rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- New Zealand ranks 34th and Uruguay ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.