Philippines vs Tunisia: Closed shrubland — Emissions
Philippines
0 kt
in 2024
Tunisia
0 kt
in 2024
Philippines rank
34th
Tunisia rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions over time
- Philippines
- Tunisia
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Tunisia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Philippines ahead.
Philippines ranks 34th and Tunisia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0102 kt | 0.0026 kt | 0.0076 kt | Philippines |
| 2000s | 0.0012 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.001 kt | Philippines |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0013 kt | 0.0013 kt | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0003 kt | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Philippines or Tunisia?
- Philippines, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Philippines and Tunisia?
- 0 kt, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Tunisia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Philippines and Tunisia rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Philippines ranks 34th and Tunisia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.