Philippines vs Uzbekistan: Closed shrubland — Emissions
Philippines
0 kt
in 2024
Uzbekistan
0 kt
in 2024
Philippines rank
34th
Uzbekistan rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions over time
- Philippines
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Philippines ranks 34th and Uzbekistan ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0119 kt | 0.0502 kt | 0.0383 kt | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 0.0012 kt | 0.0071 kt | 0.0059 kt | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Philippines or Uzbekistan?
- Philippines, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Philippines and Uzbekistan?
- 0 kt, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Uzbekistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Philippines and Uzbekistan rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Philippines ranks 34th and Uzbekistan ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.