Polynesia vs Rwanda: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1
Polynesia
0 kt
in 2024
Rwanda
0 kt
in 2024
Polynesia rank
36th
Rwanda rank
36th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Polynesia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Polynesia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Rwanda, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Polynesia ranks 36th and Rwanda ranks 36th of 235 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Polynesia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0.0019 kt | 0.0019 kt | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0004 kt | 0.0004 kt | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1, Polynesia or Rwanda?
- Polynesia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1 between Polynesia and Rwanda?
- 0 kt, with Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Polynesia and Rwanda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Polynesia and Rwanda rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1?
- Polynesia ranks 36th and Rwanda ranks 36th of 235 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.