Rwanda vs Serbia and Montenegro: Closed shrubland — Emissions
Rwanda
0 kt
in 2024
Serbia and Montenegro
0 kt
in 2005
Rwanda rank
34th
Serbia and Montenegro rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions over time
- Rwanda
- Serbia and Montenegro
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Serbia and Montenegro, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Serbia and Montenegro ahead.
Rwanda ranks 34th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and Serbia and Montenegro in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Serbia and Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0022 kt | 0.0025 kt | 0.0003 kt | Serbia and Montenegro |
| 2000s | 0.0007 kt | 0.0005 kt | 0.0003 kt | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Rwanda or Serbia and Montenegro?
- Rwanda, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Serbia and Montenegro as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Rwanda and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 0 kt, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2005.
- How do Rwanda and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Rwanda ranks 34th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.