Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Serbia and Montenegro or Tunisia?

Serbia and Montenegro, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Tunisia as of 2005.

What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Serbia and Montenegro and Tunisia?

0 kt, with Serbia and Montenegro ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Montenegro and Tunisia?

14 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2005.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Serbia and Montenegro vs Tunisia: Closed shrubland — Emissions

Serbia and Montenegro

0 kt

in 2005

Tunisia

0 kt

in 2024

Serbia and Montenegro rank

34th

Tunisia rank

34th

Closed shrubland — Emissions over time

Serbia and Montenegro
Tunisia

How they compare

Serbia and Montenegro currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Tunisia, a difference of 0 kt.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Serbia and Montenegro ahead.

Serbia and Montenegro ranks 34th and Tunisia ranks 34th of 219 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Serbia and Montenegro averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Serbia and Montenegro	Tunisia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0025 kt	0.0029 kt	0.0004 kt	Tunisia
2000s	0.0005 kt	0.0003 kt	0.0001 kt	Serbia and Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Serbia and Montenegro or Tunisia?: Serbia and Montenegro, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Tunisia as of 2005.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Serbia and Montenegro and Tunisia?: 0 kt, with Serbia and Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Montenegro and Tunisia?: 14 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2005.
How do Serbia and Montenegro and Tunisia rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?: Serbia and Montenegro ranks 34th and Tunisia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Serbia and Montenegro vs Tunisia: Closed shrubland — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/serbia-and-montenegro/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/serbia-and-montenegro/tunisia/">Serbia and Montenegro vs Tunisia: Closed shrubland — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4)
Unit: kt
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 271 places, 9,259 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed: 12 August 2026

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.