Serbia and Montenegro vs Uruguay: Closed shrubland — Emissions
Serbia and Montenegro
0 kt
in 2005
Uruguay
0 kt
in 2024
Serbia and Montenegro rank
34th
Uruguay rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions over time
- Serbia and Montenegro
- Uruguay
How they compare
Serbia and Montenegro currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Uruguay, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Serbia and Montenegro ranks 34th and Uruguay ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia and Montenegro | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0025 kt | 0.0118 kt | 0.0093 kt | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 0.0005 kt | 0.008 kt | 0.0075 kt | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Serbia and Montenegro or Uruguay?
- Serbia and Montenegro, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Uruguay as of 2005.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Serbia and Montenegro and Uruguay?
- 0 kt, with Serbia and Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Montenegro and Uruguay?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2005.
- How do Serbia and Montenegro and Uruguay rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Serbia and Montenegro ranks 34th and Uruguay ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.