Tunisia vs Uzbekistan: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4)
Tunisia
0 kt
in 2024
Uzbekistan
0 kt
in 2024
Tunisia rank
34th
Uzbekistan rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Tunisia
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Tunisia ranks 34th and Uzbekistan ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Tunisia averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tunisia | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0029 kt | 0.0502 kt | 0.0473 kt | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 0.0002 kt | 0.0071 kt | 0.0069 kt | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 0.0013 kt | 0 kt | 0.0013 kt | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 0.0003 kt | 0 kt | 0.0003 kt | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Tunisia or Uzbekistan?
- Tunisia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Tunisia and Uzbekistan?
- 0 kt, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tunisia and Uzbekistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Tunisia and Uzbekistan rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Tunisia ranks 34th and Uzbekistan ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.