Algeria vs China: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), per capita
Algeria
0 kt per person
in 2024
China
0 kt per person
in 2024
Algeria rank
31st
China rank
30th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), per capita over time
- Algeria
- China
How they compare
China currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Algeria, a difference of 0 kt per person.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Algeria ahead.
Algeria ranks 31st and China ranks 30th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Algeria averaged higher in 3 and China in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Algeria |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Algeria |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Algeria |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), per capita, Algeria or China?
- China, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Algeria as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), per capita between Algeria and China?
- 0 kt per person, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and China?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Algeria and China rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), per capita?
- Algeria ranks 31st and China ranks 30th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.