Croatia vs Guatemala: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), per capita
Croatia
0 kt per person
in 2024
Guatemala
0 kt per person
in 2024
Croatia rank
31st
Guatemala rank
31st
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), per capita over time
- Croatia
- Guatemala
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Guatemala, a difference of 0 kt per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 31st and Guatemala ranks 31st of 186 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Croatia |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Croatia |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), per capita, Croatia or Guatemala?
- Croatia, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Guatemala as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), per capita between Croatia and Guatemala?
- 0 kt per person, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Guatemala?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and Guatemala rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), per capita?
- Croatia ranks 31st and Guatemala ranks 31st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.