Cuba vs Turkmenistan: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), per capita
Cuba
0 kt per person
in 2024
Turkmenistan
0 kt per person
in 2024
Cuba rank
31st
Turkmenistan rank
31st
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), per capita over time
- Cuba
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0 kt per person.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Turkmenistan ahead.
Cuba ranks 31st and Turkmenistan ranks 31st of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Turkmenistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Turkmenistan |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Turkmenistan |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), per capita, Cuba or Turkmenistan?
- Cuba, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Turkmenistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), per capita between Cuba and Turkmenistan?
- 0 kt per person, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Turkmenistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Turkmenistan rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), per capita?
- Cuba ranks 31st and Turkmenistan ranks 31st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.