Ecuador vs Malawi: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), per capita
Ecuador
0 kt per person
in 2024
Malawi
0 kt per person
in 2024
Ecuador rank
25th
Malawi rank
26th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), per capita over time
- Ecuador
- Malawi
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Malawi, a difference of 0 kt per person.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.2 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Malawi ahead.
Ecuador ranks 25th and Malawi ranks 26th of 186 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Malawi |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Malawi |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Malawi |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), per capita, Ecuador or Malawi?
- Ecuador, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), per capita between Ecuador and Malawi?
- 0 kt per person, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Malawi?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Malawi rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), per capita?
- Ecuador ranks 25th and Malawi ranks 26th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.