Finland vs Kazakhstan: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), per capita
Finland
0 kt per person
in 2024
Kazakhstan
0 kt per person
in 2024
Finland rank
31st
Kazakhstan rank
31st
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), per capita over time
- Finland
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Finland currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 kt per person.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 31st and Kazakhstan ranks 31st of 186 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), per capita, Finland or Kazakhstan?
- Finland, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), per capita between Finland and Kazakhstan?
- 0 kt per person, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Kazakhstan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Finland and Kazakhstan rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), per capita?
- Finland ranks 31st and Kazakhstan ranks 31st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.