Libya vs Nepal: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), per capita
Libya
0 kt per person
in 2024
Nepal
0 kt per person
in 2024
Libya rank
31st
Nepal rank
31st
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), per capita over time
- Libya
- Nepal
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Nepal, a difference of 0 kt per person.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 31st and Nepal ranks 31st of 186 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Nepal |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Nepal |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), per capita, Libya or Nepal?
- Libya, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Nepal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), per capita between Libya and Nepal?
- 0 kt per person, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Nepal?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Nepal rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), per capita?
- Libya ranks 31st and Nepal ranks 31st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.