Lithuania vs Pakistan: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), per capita
Lithuania
0 kt per person
in 2024
Pakistan
0 kt per person
in 2024
Lithuania rank
31st
Pakistan rank
29th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), per capita over time
- Lithuania
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Lithuania, a difference of 0 kt per person.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 31st and Pakistan ranks 29th of 186 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Pakistan |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), per capita, Lithuania or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Lithuania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), per capita between Lithuania and Pakistan?
- 0 kt per person, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Pakistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and Pakistan rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), per capita?
- Lithuania ranks 31st and Pakistan ranks 29th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.