Norway vs Tunisia: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), per capita
Norway
0 kt per person
in 2024
Tunisia
0 kt per person
in 2024
Norway rank
31st
Tunisia rank
31st
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), per capita over time
- Norway
- Tunisia
How they compare
Norway currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Tunisia, a difference of 0 kt per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Tunisia ahead.
Norway ranks 31st and Tunisia ranks 31st of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Norway |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), per capita, Norway or Tunisia?
- Norway, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), per capita between Norway and Tunisia?
- 0 kt per person, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Tunisia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Norway and Tunisia rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), per capita?
- Norway ranks 31st and Tunisia ranks 31st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.