Puerto Rico vs Uganda: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), per capita
Puerto Rico
0 kt per person
in 2024
Uganda
0 kt per person
in 2024
Puerto Rico rank
31st
Uganda rank
31st
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), per capita over time
- Puerto Rico
- Uganda
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Uganda, a difference of 0 kt per person.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
Puerto Rico ranks 31st and Uganda ranks 31st of 186 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Puerto Rico | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Uganda |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Uganda |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Uganda |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), per capita, Puerto Rico or Uganda?
- Puerto Rico, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Uganda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), per capita between Puerto Rico and Uganda?
- 0 kt per person, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Uganda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Puerto Rico and Uganda rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), per capita?
- Puerto Rico ranks 31st and Uganda ranks 31st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.