Australia and New Zealand vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O)

Australia and New Zealand
1.72 kt
in 2024
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
1.79 kt
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
2nd
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank
5th

Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O) over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
051015199020072024

How they compare

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) currently reports 1.79 kt against 1.72 kt in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.07 kt.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 2nd and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 5th of 219 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 4.27 kt 5.37 kt 1.1 kt Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2000s 8.08 kt 4.36 kt 3.72 kt Australia and New Zealand
2010s 6.24 kt 3.41 kt 2.83 kt Australia and New Zealand
2020s 3.69 kt 2.48 kt 1.21 kt Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Australia and New Zealand or Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), at 1.79 kt against 1.72 kt in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Australia and New Zealand and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
0.07 kt, with Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 2nd and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 5th of 219 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Closed shrubland — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/">Australia and New Zealand vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Closed shrubland — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
271 places, 9,259 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.