Bahamas vs Sri Lanka: Closed shrubland — Emissions
Bahamas
0 kt
in 2024
Sri Lanka
0 kt
in 2024
Bahamas rank
34th
Sri Lanka rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions over time
- Bahamas
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Bahamas ranks 34th and Sri Lanka ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 2 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0012 kt | 0.0016 kt | 0.0003 kt | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 0.0003 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.0001 kt | Bahamas |
| 2010s | 0.0001 kt | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | Bahamas |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Bahamas or Sri Lanka?
- Bahamas, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Bahamas and Sri Lanka?
- 0 kt, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Sri Lanka?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Bahamas and Sri Lanka rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Bahamas ranks 34th and Sri Lanka ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.