Belarus vs Uruguay: Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O)
Belarus
0 kt
in 2024
Uruguay
0 kt
in 2024
Belarus rank
34th
Uruguay rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Belarus
- Uruguay
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Uruguay, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 34th and Uruguay ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0005 kt | 0.001 kt | 0.0006 kt | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0005 kt | 0.0005 kt | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Belarus or Uruguay?
- Belarus, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Uruguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Belarus and Uruguay?
- 0 kt, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Uruguay?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Uruguay rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Belarus ranks 34th and Uruguay ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.