China, Hong Kong SAR vs Romania: Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O)
China, Hong Kong SAR
0 kt
in 2024
Romania
0 kt
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
34th
Romania rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O) over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Romania
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Romania, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 34th and Romania ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0 kt | Romania |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, China, Hong Kong SAR or Romania?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Romania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between China, Hong Kong SAR and Romania?
- 0 kt, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Romania?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Romania rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 34th and Romania ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.