Costa Rica vs Eswatini: Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O)
Costa Rica
0 kt
in 2024
Eswatini
0 kt
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
34th
Eswatini rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Costa Rica
- Eswatini
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Eswatini, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 34th and Eswatini ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0002 kt | 0.0018 kt | 0.0017 kt | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0017 kt | 0.0016 kt | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0003 kt | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Costa Rica or Eswatini?
- Costa Rica, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Costa Rica and Eswatini?
- 0 kt, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Eswatini?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Eswatini rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Costa Rica ranks 34th and Eswatini ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.