Cuba vs Mongolia: Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O)
Cuba
0 kt
in 2024
Mongolia
0 kt
in 2024
Cuba rank
34th
Mongolia rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Cuba
- Mongolia
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Mongolia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mongolia ahead.
Cuba ranks 34th and Mongolia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0017 kt | 0.0146 kt | 0.0129 kt | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 0.0005 kt | 0.0012 kt | 0.0007 kt | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Cuba or Mongolia?
- Cuba, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Mongolia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Cuba and Mongolia?
- 0 kt, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Mongolia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Mongolia rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Cuba ranks 34th and Mongolia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.