Cuba vs Sri Lanka: Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O)
Cuba
0 kt
in 2024
Sri Lanka
0 kt
in 2024
Cuba rank
34th
Sri Lanka rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Cuba
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Cuba ranks 34th and Sri Lanka ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0017 kt | 0.0016 kt | 0.0001 kt | Cuba |
| 2000s | 0.0005 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.0003 kt | Cuba |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Cuba or Sri Lanka?
- Cuba, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Cuba and Sri Lanka?
- 0 kt, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Sri Lanka?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Sri Lanka rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Cuba ranks 34th and Sri Lanka ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.