Cyprus vs Eswatini: Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O)
Cyprus
0 kt
in 2024
Eswatini
0 kt
in 2024
Cyprus rank
34th
Eswatini rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Cyprus
- Eswatini
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Eswatini, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Eswatini ahead.
Cyprus ranks 34th and Eswatini ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0004 kt | 0.0018 kt | 0.0014 kt | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 0.0005 kt | 0.0017 kt | 0.0012 kt | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0003 kt | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Cyprus or Eswatini?
- Cyprus, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Cyprus and Eswatini?
- 0 kt, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Eswatini?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Cyprus and Eswatini rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Cyprus ranks 34th and Eswatini ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.