Ecuador vs Malawi: Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O)
Ecuador
0.0001 kt
in 2024
Malawi
0.0001 kt
in 2024
Ecuador rank
29th
Malawi rank
29th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Ecuador
- Malawi
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0.0001 kt against 0.0001 kt in Malawi, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Malawi ahead.
Ecuador ranks 29th and Malawi ranks 29th of 219 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0006 kt | 0.0061 kt | 0.0055 kt | Malawi |
| 2000s | 0.0004 kt | 0.0026 kt | 0.0022 kt | Malawi |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.0002 kt | Malawi |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Ecuador or Malawi?
- Ecuador, at 0.0001 kt against 0.0001 kt in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Ecuador and Malawi?
- 0 kt, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Malawi?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Malawi rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Ecuador ranks 29th and Malawi ranks 29th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.