Ecuador vs Panama: Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O)
Ecuador
0.0001 kt
in 2024
Panama
0.0002 kt
in 2024
Ecuador rank
29th
Panama rank
27th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Ecuador
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 0.0002 kt against 0.0001 kt in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0001 kt.
That makes Panama's figure about 2.0 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 29th and Panama ranks 27th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Panama in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0006 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.0005 kt | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 0.0004 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0003 kt | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Ecuador or Panama?
- Panama, at 0.0002 kt against 0.0001 kt in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Ecuador and Panama?
- 0.0001 kt, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Panama?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Panama rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Ecuador ranks 29th and Panama ranks 27th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.