Eritrea vs Sri Lanka: Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O)
Eritrea
0 kt
in 2024
Sri Lanka
0 kt
in 2024
Eritrea rank
34th
Sri Lanka rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Eritrea
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 34th and Sri Lanka ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0009 kt | 0.0019 kt | 0.001 kt | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 0.0002 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.0001 kt | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Eritrea or Sri Lanka?
- Eritrea, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Eritrea and Sri Lanka?
- 0 kt, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Sri Lanka?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Eritrea and Sri Lanka rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Eritrea ranks 34th and Sri Lanka ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.