Eswatini vs Sudan (former): Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O)
Eswatini
0 kt
in 2024
Sudan (former)
0 kt
in 2011
Eswatini rank
34th
Sudan (former) rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Eswatini
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Sudan (former), a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 34th and Sudan (former) ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Sudan (former) in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0018 kt | 0.9037 kt | 0.9019 kt | Sudan (former) |
| 2000s | 0.0017 kt | 0.1891 kt | 0.1874 kt | Sudan (former) |
| 2010s | 0.001 kt | 0 kt | 0.001 kt | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Eswatini or Sudan (former)?
- Eswatini, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Sudan (former) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Eswatini and Sudan (former)?
- 0 kt, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Sudan (former)?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2011.
- How do Eswatini and Sudan (former) rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Eswatini ranks 34th and Sudan (former) ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.