Finland vs Turkmenistan: Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O)
Finland
0 kt
in 2024
Turkmenistan
0 kt
in 2024
Finland rank
34th
Turkmenistan rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Finland
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Finland currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Turkmenistan has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 34th and Turkmenistan ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0002 kt | 0.0043 kt | 0.0041 kt | Turkmenistan |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0005 kt | 0.0005 kt | Turkmenistan |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Finland or Turkmenistan?
- Finland, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Turkmenistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Finland and Turkmenistan?
- 0 kt, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Turkmenistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Finland and Turkmenistan rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Finland ranks 34th and Turkmenistan ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.