French Guiana vs Latvia: Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O)
French Guiana
0 kt
in 2024
Latvia
0 kt
in 2024
French Guiana rank
34th
Latvia rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O) over time
- French Guiana
- Latvia
How they compare
French Guiana currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Latvia, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
French Guiana ranks 34th and Latvia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Guiana | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, French Guiana or Latvia?
- French Guiana, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between French Guiana and Latvia?
- 0 kt, with French Guiana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Guiana and Latvia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do French Guiana and Latvia rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- French Guiana ranks 34th and Latvia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.