Indonesia vs Serbia and Montenegro: Closed shrubland — Emissions
Indonesia
0 kt
in 2024
Serbia and Montenegro
0 kt
in 2005
Indonesia rank
34th
Serbia and Montenegro rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions over time
- Indonesia
- Serbia and Montenegro
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Serbia and Montenegro, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.
Indonesia ranks 34th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Serbia and Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0179 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0176 kt | Indonesia |
| 2000s | 0.0029 kt | 0 kt | 0.0029 kt | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Indonesia or Serbia and Montenegro?
- Indonesia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Serbia and Montenegro as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Indonesia and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 0 kt, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2005.
- How do Indonesia and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Indonesia ranks 34th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.