Israel vs Uruguay: Closed shrubland — Emissions
Israel
0 kt
in 2024
Uruguay
0 kt
in 2024
Israel rank
34th
Uruguay rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions over time
- Israel
- Uruguay
How they compare
Israel currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Uruguay, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 34th and Uruguay ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0.0009 kt | 0.0009 kt | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0005 kt | 0.0005 kt | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Israel or Uruguay?
- Israel, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Uruguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Israel and Uruguay?
- 0 kt, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Uruguay?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Israel and Uruguay rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Israel ranks 34th and Uruguay ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.