Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Mozambique: Closed shrubland — Emissions

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
0.1554 kt
in 2024
Mozambique
0.0303 kt
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
9th
Mozambique rank
9th

Closed shrubland — Emissions over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Mozambique
0123199020072024

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 0.1554 kt against 0.0303 kt in Mozambique, a difference of 0.1251 kt.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 5.1 times Mozambique's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 9th and Mozambique ranks 9th of 31 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Mozambique Difference Ahead
1990s 2.02 kt 0.2628 kt 1.75 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 1.34 kt 0.2032 kt 1.13 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 0.7432 kt 0.1161 kt 0.6271 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 0.185 kt 0.049 kt 0.136 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Mozambique?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 0.1554 kt against 0.0303 kt in Mozambique as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Mozambique?
0.1251 kt, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Mozambique?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Mozambique rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 9th and Mozambique ranks 9th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Mozambique: Closed shrubland — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/mozambique/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Mozambique: Closed shrubland — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
271 places, 9,259 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.