Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Namibia: Closed shrubland — Emissions

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
0.1554 kt
in 2024
Namibia
0.0978 kt
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
6th
Namibia rank
6th

Closed shrubland — Emissions over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Namibia
01234199020072024

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 0.1554 kt against 0.0978 kt in Namibia, a difference of 0.0576 kt.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 1.6 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 6th and Namibia ranks 6th of 12 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 2.02 kt 0.5909 kt 1.43 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 1.34 kt 0.8507 kt 0.487 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 0.7432 kt 1.41 kt 0.6677 kt Namibia
2020s 0.185 kt 1.1 kt 0.9103 kt Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Namibia?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 0.1554 kt against 0.0978 kt in Namibia as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Namibia?
0.0576 kt, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Namibia?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Namibia rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 6th and Namibia ranks 6th of 12 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Namibia: Closed shrubland — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/namibia/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Namibia: Closed shrubland — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
271 places, 9,259 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.