Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs South Africa: Closed shrubland — Emissions

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
0.1554 kt
in 2024
South Africa
0.2027 kt
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
9th
South Africa rank
5th

Closed shrubland — Emissions over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • South Africa
0123199020072024

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 0.2027 kt against 0.1554 kt in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 0.0473 kt.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.3 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 9th and South Africa ranks 5th of 31 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 2.02 kt 0.8412 kt 1.17 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 1.34 kt 0.4755 kt 0.8622 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 0.7432 kt 0.3928 kt 0.3504 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 0.185 kt 0.1615 kt 0.0234 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or South Africa?
South Africa, at 0.2027 kt against 0.1554 kt in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and South Africa?
0.0473 kt, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and South Africa?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and South Africa rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 9th and South Africa ranks 5th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs South Africa: Closed shrubland — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/south-africa/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs South Africa: Closed shrubland — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
271 places, 9,259 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.