Libya vs Malaysia: Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O)
Libya
0 kt
in 2024
Malaysia
0 kt
in 2024
Libya rank
34th
Malaysia rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Libya
- Malaysia
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Malaysia, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 34th and Malaysia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0004 kt | 0.0003 kt | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Libya or Malaysia?
- Libya, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Malaysia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Libya and Malaysia?
- 0 kt, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Malaysia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Malaysia rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Libya ranks 34th and Malaysia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.