Mongolia vs Tunisia: Closed shrubland — Emissions
Mongolia
0 kt
in 2024
Tunisia
0 kt
in 2024
Mongolia rank
34th
Tunisia rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions over time
- Mongolia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Tunisia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 34th and Tunisia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0146 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.0143 kt | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 0.0012 kt | 0 kt | 0.0012 kt | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Mongolia or Tunisia?
- Mongolia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Mongolia and Tunisia?
- 0 kt, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Tunisia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Mongolia and Tunisia rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Mongolia ranks 34th and Tunisia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.