New Zealand vs Sri Lanka: Closed shrubland — Emissions
New Zealand
0 kt
in 2024
Sri Lanka
0 kt
in 2024
New Zealand rank
34th
Sri Lanka rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions over time
- New Zealand
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 34th and Sri Lanka ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0016 kt | 0.0015 kt | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.0002 kt | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, New Zealand or Sri Lanka?
- New Zealand, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between New Zealand and Sri Lanka?
- 0 kt, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Sri Lanka?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do New Zealand and Sri Lanka rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- New Zealand ranks 34th and Sri Lanka ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.