Sri Lanka vs Tunisia: Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O)
Sri Lanka
0 kt
in 2024
Tunisia
0 kt
in 2024
Sri Lanka rank
34th
Tunisia rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Sri Lanka
- Tunisia
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Tunisia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 34th and Tunisia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0016 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.0013 kt | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 0.0002 kt | 0 kt | 0.0002 kt | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Sri Lanka or Tunisia?
- Sri Lanka, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Sri Lanka and Tunisia?
- 0 kt, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Tunisia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Sri Lanka and Tunisia rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Sri Lanka ranks 34th and Tunisia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.