Belgium vs Turks and Caicos Islands: CO₂ emissions per capita vs. fossil fuel consumption per capita

Belgium
7.28 tonnes per person
in 2024
Turks and Caicos Islands
8.14 tonnes per person
in 2024
Belgium rank
38th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
35th

CO₂ emissions per capita vs. fossil fuel consumption per capita over time

  • Belgium
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
051015180219132024

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 8.14 tonnes per person against 7.28 tonnes per person in Belgium, a difference of 0.86 tonnes per person.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.1 times Belgium's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 38th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 35th of 213 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 3 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 12.33 tonnes per person 4.97 tonnes per person 7.36 tonnes per person Belgium
2000s 11.79 tonnes per person 7.81 tonnes per person 3.98 tonnes per person Belgium
2010s 9.11 tonnes per person 8.76 tonnes per person 0.3476 tonnes per person Belgium
2020s 7.65 tonnes per person 8.04 tonnes per person 0.3839 tonnes per person Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher co₂ emissions per capita vs. fossil fuel consumption per capita, Belgium or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 8.14 tonnes per person against 7.28 tonnes per person in Belgium as of 2024.
What is the difference in co₂ emissions per capita vs. fossil fuel consumption per capita between Belgium and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.86 tonnes per person, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Turks and Caicos Islands?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Belgium and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for co₂ emissions per capita vs. fossil fuel consumption per capita?
Belgium ranks 38th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 35th of 213 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Carbon Budget (2025); Population based on various sources (2024) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as CO₂ emissions per capita vs. fossil fuel consumption per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Turks and Caicos Islands: CO₂ emissions per capita vs. fossil fuel consumption per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Global Carbon Budget (2025); Population based on various sources (2024) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co-emissions-per-capita-vs-fossil-fuel-consumption-per-capita/belgium/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co-emissions-per-capita-vs-fossil-fuel-consumption-per-capita/belgium/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Belgium vs Turks and Caicos Islands: CO₂ emissions per capita vs. fossil fuel consumption per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CO₂ emissions per capita vs. fossil fuel consumption per capita
Unit
tonnes per person
Source
Global Carbon Budget (2025); Population based on various sources (2024) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
213 places, 22,945 data points, 1750–2024
Last refreshed

Carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions from burning fossil fuels and industrial processes. This includes emissions from transport, electricity generation, and heating, but not land-use change.