Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: CO₂ emissions per capita vs. fossil fuel consumption per capita

Papua New Guinea
0.7891 tonnes per person
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0.8237 tonnes per person
in 2024
Papua New Guinea rank
166th
Zimbabwe rank
164th

CO₂ emissions per capita vs. fossil fuel consumption per capita over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Zimbabwe
00.511.52190319632024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.8237 tonnes per person against 0.7891 tonnes per person in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.0346 tonnes per person.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 75 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 166th and Zimbabwe ranks 164th of 213 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1950s 0.0627 tonnes per person 1.51 tonnes per person 1.45 tonnes per person Zimbabwe
1960s 0.1434 tonnes per person 1.24 tonnes per person 1.1 tonnes per person Zimbabwe
1970s 0.4926 tonnes per person 1.52 tonnes per person 1.03 tonnes per person Zimbabwe
1980s 0.5948 tonnes per person 1.38 tonnes per person 0.7833 tonnes per person Zimbabwe
1990s 0.5198 tonnes per person 1.41 tonnes per person 0.8938 tonnes per person Zimbabwe
2000s 0.7073 tonnes per person 0.8489 tonnes per person 0.1416 tonnes per person Zimbabwe
2010s 0.6915 tonnes per person 0.7547 tonnes per person 0.0633 tonnes per person Zimbabwe
2020s 0.8025 tonnes per person 0.7203 tonnes per person 0.0822 tonnes per person Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher co₂ emissions per capita vs. fossil fuel consumption per capita, Papua New Guinea or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.8237 tonnes per person against 0.7891 tonnes per person in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in co₂ emissions per capita vs. fossil fuel consumption per capita between Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
0.0346 tonnes per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
75 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2024.
How do Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe rank globally for co₂ emissions per capita vs. fossil fuel consumption per capita?
Papua New Guinea ranks 166th and Zimbabwe ranks 164th of 213 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Carbon Budget (2025); Population based on various sources (2024) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as CO₂ emissions per capita vs. fossil fuel consumption per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: CO₂ emissions per capita vs. fossil fuel consumption per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Global Carbon Budget (2025); Population based on various sources (2024) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co-emissions-per-capita-vs-fossil-fuel-consumption-per-capita/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co-emissions-per-capita-vs-fossil-fuel-consumption-per-capita/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/">Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: CO₂ emissions per capita vs. fossil fuel consumption per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CO₂ emissions per capita vs. fossil fuel consumption per capita
Unit
tonnes per person
Source
Global Carbon Budget (2025); Population based on various sources (2024) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
213 places, 22,945 data points, 1750–2024
Last refreshed

Carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions from burning fossil fuels and industrial processes. This includes emissions from transport, electricity generation, and heating, but not land-use change.