Aruba vs Burundi: Co2 emissions fossil land

Aruba
920,644
in 2024
Burundi
916,664
in 2024
Aruba rank
168th
Burundi rank
169th

Co2 emissions fossil land over time

  • Aruba
  • Burundi
01.0M2.0M3.0M192619752024

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 920,644 against 916,664 in Burundi, a difference of 3,980.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 75 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 168th and Burundi ranks 169th of 215 countries.

Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Burundi Difference Ahead
1950s 630,584 13,065 617,520 Aruba
1960s 660,602 48,354 612,248 Aruba
1970s 771,616 85,005 686,612 Aruba
1980s 571,059 209,581 361,478 Aruba
1990s 667,214 235,595 431,619 Aruba
2000s 2.59 million 200,421 2.39 million Aruba
2010s 1.25 million 456,150 788,877 Aruba
2020s 875,477 841,202 34,275 Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher co2 emissions fossil land, Aruba or Burundi?
Aruba, at 920,644 against 916,664 in Burundi as of 2024.
What is the difference in co2 emissions fossil land between Aruba and Burundi?
3,980, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Burundi?
75 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2024.
How do Aruba and Burundi rank globally for co2 emissions fossil land?
Aruba ranks 168th and Burundi ranks 169th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Our World in Data, published as Co2 emissions fossil land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Co2 emissions fossil land
Source
Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
216 places, 22,638 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed